The Trucking Insurance Gap Is a Cross-Border Story
Every carrier with active for-hire FMCSA operating authority is supposed to keep liability insurance on file. 16,938 of 328,575 (5.2%) have no liability (BIPD) amount recorded in the public authority register. The headline number sounds alarming — until you ask who those carriers are. They are overwhelmingly not U.S. trucking companies.
The headline numbers
The overall 5.2% gap collapses to just 0.6% once you isolate U.S.-domiciled for-hire carriers. The difference is almost entirely cross-border authorities.
Who actually makes up the “no insurance on file” gap
Of the 16,938 for-hire authorities with no liability amount on file, 15,100 (89.1%) are cross-border carriers and only 1,838 (10.9%) are U.S.-domiciled. The “uninsured trucker” story is, in the data, mostly a cross-border filing-coverage story — non-U.S. authorities frequently carry their insurance through different filing channels that the L&I register may not record the same way.
The small U.S. slice, by state
Show data table
| State | Carriers |
|---|---|
| California | 266 |
| Texas | 209 |
| Florida | 141 |
| Ohio | 88 |
| Georgia | 86 |
| Illinois | 80 |
| North Carolina | 78 |
| New Jersey | 71 |
| Pennsylvania | 63 |
| Indiana | 59 |
| Maryland | 46 |
| Virginia | 41 |
Even within the 1,838 U.S. carriers with no amount on file, the counts are small and track the largest trucking states by raw carrier population — not a sign that any state's carriers are unusually likely to operate without coverage.
Insurance and safety are two different signals
It is tempting to read “no insurance on file” as “unsafe.” The public record does not support that leap. A carrier’s liability filing and its BASIC percentile estimates (HaulReport’s reconstructed peer-rank of a carrier’s roadside-inspection record) are independent indicators measuring different things — one is a financial-responsibility filing, the other a safety-history rank. We publish both, clearly labeled, and we deliberately do not claim a measured statistical link between them here. When you vet a carrier, read each signal on its own terms.
Why you can’t find this elsewhere
SAFER and other lookups show one carrier’s insurance status at a time. Because HaulReport aggregates the entire authority register and keeps a daily history, we can answer the population-level question — who actually makes up the no-file gap — and watch it move. See the full counts in carrier insurance statistics, the state breakdown in carriers without insurance by state, and the live movement on our daily authority change feed.
Frequently asked questions
- How many trucking companies have no insurance on file with the FMCSA?
- Of 328,575 carriers with active for-hire operating authority, 16,938 (5.2%) have no liability (BIPD) insurance amount recorded in the public authority register. This is a filing-record signal — filings can lag, so a blank amount is not proof a carrier is uninsured or operating unlawfully.
- Are U.S. trucking companies usually uninsured?
- No. Among U.S.-domiciled for-hire carriers, only 0.6% (1,838) have no liability amount on file. The no-file gap is concentrated in cross-border carriers, which make up 89.1% of it.
- Do FMCSA BASIC scores affect a carrier's insurance?
- BASIC percentiles and insurance filings are two separate public signals. BASIC percentiles rank a carrier's roadside-inspection record against peers; the insurance figure here is simply whether a liability amount is on file. HaulReport publishes reconstructed BASIC percentile estimates, but this study does not assert a measured statistical link between the two — they are reported as distinct indicators, not a cause-and-effect relationship.
- Where does this insurance data come from?
- The public FMCSA Licensing & Insurance (L&I) authority register (dataset 6eyk-hxee), which records each carrier's operating-authority status and the insurance amounts filed on their behalf. HaulReport aggregates it; we do not set or verify the filings themselves.